Project Cost Tracking Software
Every project cost report is built on one number: what an hour of your team actually costs. Get that number wrong and the margin, the estimate at completion and the decision you take from them are all wrong together. SUNAGO Matrix derives it from salary, real utilization, holiday and overhead, then tracks cost and forecast on every project from the first logged hour.
The cost rate almost everyone uses is wrong
Ask a firm what a consultant costs per hour and the usual answer is salary divided by a standard working year. It is a tidy calculation and it is wrong in a specific, predictable direction: it always makes projects look more profitable than they are.
Nobody bills a standard year. Take out vacation entitlement. Adjust for anyone on part-time capacity. Then multiply by the utilization the person actually achieves, which for most consulting firms sits well below the target on the wall. What remains is the number of hours you can genuinely charge that salary against, and it is a great deal smaller than 1,850.
Then there is everything the billable hours have to carry: the office, the software, the operations manager, the salaries of every colleague who bills nothing. Divided across the firm's total billable hours, that overhead lands on each hour too.
SUNAGO Matrix computes cost price per hour this way as standard, from the salary, capacity, holiday and utilization figures held against each employee. Nothing is typed in and nothing is blended. Every project cost, margin and Forecast at Completion in the system inherits it.
What the difference looks like in money
One consultant, EUR 70,000 annual gross salary, 25 days holiday, full-time. The naive method on the left, the derived method on the right. The illustrative figures below use a 1,850-hour nominal year and firm overhead of EUR 20 per billable hour.
| Step | Salary / nominal year | Derived from real utilization |
|---|---|---|
| Hours the salary is spread over | 1,850 nominal hours | 1,850 less 185 holiday hours, times 70% utilization = 1,166 |
| Salary cost per billable hour | EUR 37.84 | EUR 60.03 |
| Overhead share per billable hour | Usually omitted | EUR 20.00 |
| True cost per billable hour | EUR 37.84 | EUR 80.03 |
| Margin at a EUR 95 sell rate | 60% and comfortable | 16% and exposed |
Same consultant, same salary, same sell rate. One method reports a project running at 60 percent margin, the other reports 16 percent. A firm using the first will keep bidding at EUR 95 an hour and quietly wonder why a healthy-looking portfolio does not turn into cash at the end of the year.
The gap widens as utilization falls. At 55 percent rather than 70 percent, the same person costs over EUR 96 per billable hour all-in, and EUR 95 is a loss. This is the arithmetic behind most of the margin surprises in professional services, and it is set out in full in true cost per hour for consulting firms.
What the project economy module tracks
All of it live, all of it from the same logged hours, with nothing to reconcile at month end.
Derived from salary, part-time capacity, vacation entitlement, actual utilization and each person's share of company overhead. Nothing typed in, nothing blended.
FAC as a named, standard metric on every project, updating from logged hours rather than from a status someone selected, with a drill-down across time, materials, external services and expenses.
Real-time profit and loss per project, with margin percentage visible while the work is running rather than after the invoice has gone out.
Budget tracking across phases and milestones, with progress measured in hours consumed rather than a completion percentage typed into a field.
Projects flag themselves when the forecast turns. The project finance timeline shows how cost and margin have moved, so a slow drift is as visible as a sudden one.
Subcontractors, external services and materials carried on the project alongside labour, plus expenses with automated markup where you bill them on.
Cost estimation that improves with every project
Estimating the cost of a project is guesswork the first time and evidence every time after, provided the evidence was recorded properly. Because hours are logged against phases and the cost rate behind them is derived rather than assumed, a finished project in SUNAGO Matrix is a usable benchmark for the next proposal instead of a number nobody trusts.
That closes the loop that most firms leave open. The estimate informs the budget, the budget is tracked against actual hours, the variance is visible as Forecast at Completion moves, and the completed project tells you how good the original estimate was. Pricing stops being a matter of instinct and repeated optimism.
For the accounting side of the same question, estimate at completion and forecast at completion explained covers the formulas, and project profitability tracking covers what to do with the output.
Where the cost data comes from
Every logged hour reprices the project at that person's derived cost rate.
Learn moreBudgets, phases and milestones give the cost tracking something to track against.
Learn moreProject economics rolled up to the firm, next to utilization and revenue per head.
Learn moreProject costing: common questions
Cost rates, Forecast at Completion, and how this differs from project accounting.
What is project costing?
How do you calculate the true cost of a project hour?
What is Forecast at Completion, and is it the same as EAC?
How is this different from project accounting in an ERP?
Do we have to enter cost rates manually?
What warns us when a project is going wrong?
Find out what your hours actually cost
EUR 3 per seat per month billed yearly, every module included, free onboarding and data transfer. 14-day trial, no credit card required.